An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

Uganda unspecified sense

place · 15 mentions

a political division in East Africa

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

Uganda_coffee_ — 2 shared claimsCoffee — 2 shared claims9,999,845 pounds — 1 shared claim21,000 acres — 1 shared claimrobusta coffee — 1 shared claimRobusta coffee — 1 shared claim_coffee_Coffee9,999,845 pounds21,000 acresrobusta coffeeRobusta coffee
Concept

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • Uganda produced coffee 9,999,845 pounds 1918
    Uganda, 9,999,845 pounds in 1918
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly lists 'Uganda, 9,999,845 pounds in 1918' as one of the largest coffee producers in Africa, making this a fully supported claim with no rewording or interpretation needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implicit in the passage structure), the stance is appropriately 'asserts' for a factual statement, sentiment is neutral as befits a statistical claim, the time qualifier '1918' matches exactly what the passage states, and the context is appropriately empty as no restrictive sense or role is specified. The quote 'Uganda, 9,999,845 pounds in 1918' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Uganda had acres under coffee cultivation 21,000 acres 1919 ⟨East African Protectorate⟩
    Uganda, in the East African Protectorate, had 21,000 acres under coffee cultivation
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly reports that 'Uganda, in the East African Protectorate, had 21,000 acres under coffee cultivation' as part of a 1919 report, matching all elements of the claim including subject, predicate, object, time, and context.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — One minor qualifier issue: viewpoint is 'author' but the passage attributes this information to 'British interests' and 'the report' from 1919, not to the author directly. The viewpoint should be 'report' or 'British interests' rather than 'author'. All other qualifiers are faithful: stance is correct (asserts), sentiment is neutral, time is accurate (1919), context properly specifies East African Protectorate, and quote is verbatim and supports the claim.
  • Uganda grows robusta coffee ⟨British East Africa⟩
    Uganda, in British East Africa, grows a good grade of _robusta_ coffee
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Uganda, in British East Africa, grows a good grade of _robusta_ coffee which is valued on the London market.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly mentioned with identical wording.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual information, not attributed to a named source). The stance is 'asserts' as appropriate. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's descriptive tone. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no specific temporal information. The context 'British East Africa' is accurately drawn from the passage. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
  • Uganda produces coffee coffee
    Uganda c., 353, 377
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage lists 'Uganda c.' with page references 353 and 377, where 'c.' is a standard abbreviation for 'coffee' used throughout the index. This directly supports the claim that Uganda produces coffee, though it is stated implicitly through abbreviated notation rather than explicit words.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The passage is an index entry listing 'Uganda c.' (coffee) with page references 353, 377, which supports the claim that Uganda produces coffee. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the index compiler). The stance is appropriately marked as 'asserts' (a straightforward factual reference in an index). The sentiment is neutral, matching the index's neutral tone. Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal information. Context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role of coffee. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • coffee is harvested Uganda one ripening in March and the other in September, practically every month except December and January ⟨Africa, two main crops⟩
    In Uganda, Africa, there are two main crops, one ripening in March and the other in September, and picking is carried on during practically every month except December and January
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The exact quote provided matches the text stating that in Uganda, Africa, there are two main crops with specific ripening times (March and September) and picking occurs during practically every month except December and January.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (not a named source), the stance is correctly marked as 'asserts', sentiment is neutral, the time specification accurately reflects the temporal scope given in the passage, the context properly identifies this as information about Uganda in Africa with two main crops, and the quote appears verbatim and supports the claim. No deductions warranted.
  • Robusta coffee is grown in Uganda
    Uganda, 353
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states under the '_Robusta, C._' entry that 'Uganda, 353' is listed, indicating that Robusta coffee is grown in Uganda. This is a direct statement with no rewording needed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The claim correctly attributes the statement to the author (as an implicit assertion from the index), uses neutral sentiment appropriate for a factual index entry, has no time qualifiers (correctly null since the passage provides none), and includes an empty context (appropriate since the passage provides none). The quote 'Uganda, 353' appears verbatim in the Robusta entry and supports the claim that Robusta coffee is grown in Uganda.

BROWN, E. and HUNTER, H.H.

  • coffee is planted in Uganda
    Planting in Uganda; coffee, Para rubber, cocoa
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 0.90 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The bibliographic entry by Brown and Hunter titled 'Planting in Uganda; coffee, Para rubber, cocoa' from 1913 explicitly states that coffee was being cultivated in Uganda during this period.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is incorrect. The passage attributes the statement to named sources (BROWN, E. and HUNTER, H.H.), not to an unnamed 'author'. The viewpoint should be 'BROWN, E. and HUNTER, H.H.' or similar, not 'author'. Additionally, the time qualifier is overly restrictive - the passage provides a publication date of 1913 but this does not necessarily mean the claim's validity is limited to that single year only. The temporal scope should be broader or 'when' should be null if no specific temporal boundary is given in the passage.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The bibliographic entry by BROWN, E. and HUNTER, H.H. explicitly mentions 'Planting in Uganda; coffee, Para rubber, cocoa,' which directly supports that coffee is planted in Uganda according to this source.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the claim to BROWN, E. and HUNTER, H.H., the authors of 'Planting in Uganda; coffee, Para rubber, cocoa' (1913). The stance is appropriately marked as 'asserts' since the passage presents this as factual information without dispute. The sentiment is neutral, matching the informational nature of the source. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null since the passage provides no specific temporal information about when coffee planting occurs in Uganda. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict coffee to a particular sense or role. The quote 'Planting in Uganda; coffee, Para rubber, cocoa' appears verbatim in the passage and supports the claim that coffee is planted in Uganda.

SMALL, W.

  • coffee is cultivated in Uganda
    Coffee cultivation in Uganda
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The bibliographic entry explicitly references 'Coffee cultivation in Uganda' by W. Small, published in the Imperial Institute Bulletin in 1914, which directly supports that coffee is cultivated in Uganda.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — VIEWPOINT is unfaithful: the claim attributes the statement to 'author' but the passage attributes it to a named source (SMALL, W.), so the viewpoint should be 'SMALL, W.' not 'author'. TIME is also unfaithful: the passage shows the publication date is 1914, but this is the date the bulletin was published, not necessarily when coffee cultivation in Uganda occurred - the claim should have null time values since the passage provides no temporal scope for when the cultivation itself takes place, only when the work was published.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. SMALL, W.'s work is titled 'Coffee cultivation in Uganda' (Imperial Institute Bulletin, 1914), which explicitly supports that coffee is cultivated in Uganda according to this source.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the claim to SMALL, W. as the named source (from the title 'Coffee cultivation in Uganda'). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for a straightforward informational work. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's treatment. Time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal scope for the claim. Context is empty, appropriate as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The quote 'Coffee cultivation in Uganda' appears verbatim in the passage and supports the claim that coffee is cultivated in Uganda.

Change over time

1918
  • produced coffee 9,999,845 pounds
1919
  • had acres under coffee cultivation 21,000 acres
one ripening in March and the other in September, practically every month except December and January
  • is harvested coffee