idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

various adulterants unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Chiappella

  • coffee is subject to adulteration various adulterants 1905 ⟨consumed in Florence⟩
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    sofisticazioni del caffe che si consuma in Firenze
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 0.90 pass — The passage directly supports this claim through Chiappella's 1905 publication titled 'Le sofisticazioni del caffe che si consuma in Firenze' (The adulterations of coffee consumed in Florence), which explicitly discusses coffee adulterations in Florence. The claim accurately reflects the cited work's content and timeframe.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote appears verbatim in the Chiappella entry (1905, n.s. V: 110-116). The viewpoint (Chiappella), stance (asserts), sentiment (neutral), context (consumed in Florence), and time (1905) are all accurate. Minor deduction: the 'valid_from' and 'valid_to' structure is not explicitly required by the qualifier fidelity criteria, but the time representation is sound - 'when': 1905 matches the publication date and the passage provides no broader temporal scope, so null for 'valid_to' is appropriate.

DUBRISAY

  • coffee undergo falsification various adulterants
    assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
    Falsifications des cafes, procedes employes a cet effet
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The bibliographic entry 'DUBRISAY. Falsifications des cafes, procedes employes a cet effet; moyens de reconnaitre et de reprimer la fraude' (1888) explicitly states that coffee undergoes falsifications, and multiple other entries in the passage confirm this general assertion about coffee adulteration and fraudulent substances across different time periods.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — Multiple qualifier issues: (1) VIEWPOINT - the claim uses 'author' but the passage attributes the statement to DUBRISAY as a named source; the viewpoint should be 'DUBRISAY', not 'author'. (2) TIME - the claim specifies 'when': '1888' but the passage provides no temporal scope within DUBRISAY's article itself; the date 1888 is the publication year but does not indicate when the falsifications occurred, so 'when' should be null. (3) QUOTE - while 'Falsifications des cafes' appears in the passage (from DUBRISAY's title), it translates to 'Falsifications of coffees' not 'subject to falsification', and the full context is about methods of falsification and means of recognizing/repressing fraud, not merely assertion that coffee is subject to falsification.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The bibliography entry for DUBRISAY's work explicitly states 'Falsifications des cafes, procedes employes a cet effet' (Falsifications of coffees, procedures employed for this effect), which directly matches the subject-predicate-object relationship that coffee undergoes falsification with various adulterants.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is highly faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to DUBRISAY (author of the cited work), the stance is appropriately 'asserts', and the sentiment 'negative' matches the critical connotation of discussing falsifications. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no specific temporal scope beyond the publication date of 1888. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or usage of coffee. The quote is accurate and verbatim from the work title. Minor deduction: the quote is from the title rather than the text body, though this is still valid support for the claim as stated in the bibliographic reference.

Change over time

1905
  • is subject to adulteration coffee