An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

Voltaire unspecified sense

person · 22 mentions

French author and philosopher, constant patron of Cafe de Procope

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

Voltairecoffee — 3 shared claimsSocrates — 2 shared claimsCafe de Procope — 1 shared claimmixture of coffee and chocolate — 1 shared claimLa Bottega di Caffe — 1 shared claimwits — 1 shared claimking of coffee drinkers — 1 shared claimRacine and coffee will pass — 1 shared claimthe famous reply to the remark that coffee was a slow poison — 1 shared claimeighty-four — 1 shared claimLe Cafe, ou l'Ecossaise, comedie — 1 shared claimLe Cafe; ou, l'Ecossaise — 1 shared claimcoffeeSocratesCafe de Procopemixture of coffee a…La Bottega di Caffewitsking of coffee drin…Racine and coffee w…the famous reply to…eighty-fourLe Cafe, ou l'Ecoss…Le Cafe; ou, l'Ecos…
ConceptPlaceWork

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • Voltaire was constant patron of Cafe de Procope
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    Voltaire was a constant patron
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Voltaire was a constant patron' of the Cafe de Procope. This is an exact match with the source text, making it fully grounded.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes the assertion without naming a specific source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is positive, matching the favorable tone regarding Voltaire's patronage. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no specific dates. The context is appropriately empty as no particular sense or role restriction is mentioned. The quote 'Voltaire was a constant patron' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • His favorite drink is said to have been a mixture of coffee and chocolate
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'His favorite drink is said to have been a mixture of coffee and chocolate.' The passage explicitly attributes this information to Voltaire in the context of his patronage of the Cafe de Procope.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and accurately supports the claim. The perspective viewpoint is listed as 'author' but the passage attributes this through a narrative voice saying 'is said to have been,' which represents the passage's own reporting rather than attribution to a named source. This is acceptable as the passage does not attribute it to a specific named source. The stance of 'asserts' is appropriate given the cautious language 'is said to have been.' Sentiment and time qualifiers are correctly neutral and null respectively, matching the passage's treatment. Context is appropriately empty. Minor deduction only for the slight ambiguity in viewpoint designation, but this is a reasonable interpretation given the passage's framing.
  • Voltaire brought out Socrates a short time before 1760
    Voltaire, who had brought out another play, _Socrates_, in the same manner a short time before
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'Voltaire, who had brought out another play, _Socrates_, in the same manner a short time before,' confirming that Voltaire wrote and brought out the play Socrates prior to 1760.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'author' (Voltaire as the creator), the stance is 'asserts' matching the passage's straightforward presentation, sentiment is neutral, the temporal qualifier correctly reflects 'a short time before 1760', and the quote is verbatim from the passage supporting the claim. Context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no restricting context for the play.
  • Voltaire was ardent devotee of coffee ⟨among the French literati⟩
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    Voltaire and Balzac were the most ardent devotees of coffee among the French _literati_.
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Voltaire and Balzac were the most ardent devotees of coffee among the French _literati_.' The subject, predicate, object, and context all match the source text exactly with minimal rewording.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Time qualifiers are correctly set to null as the passage provides no temporal scope. Context accurately reflects 'among the French literati.' Sentiment is positive, matching the passage's connotation of 'ardent devotees.' However, there is a minor issue with viewpoint: the passage does not attribute this statement to a named source or a character; it is presented as the author's own observation. The claim uses 'author' as the viewpoint, which is appropriate here since no named source is specified in the passage. All qualifiers are faithful overall.
  • Voltaire was king of wits wits 1694-1778
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    Voltaire (1694-1778) the king of wits
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact phrase 'Voltaire (1694-1778) the king of wits' appears verbatim, confirming both the characterization and the dates provided in the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is incorrect. The passage does not attribute 'the king of wits' to the author; it is a direct statement by the passage itself. The claim should use viewpoint: null (or similar to indicate no named source), not 'author'. All other qualifiers (stance, sentiment, time, context, quote) are faithful to the passage.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Voltaire (1694-1778) the king of wits, was also king of coffee drinkers.' The exact phrase 'king of wits' appears verbatim, and the dates and context are accurately represented.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — Viewpoint is unfaithful: the passage does not attribute this statement to the author but presents it as background information/historical description. The claim should use 'source': null or 'viewpoint': null rather than 'author'. All other qualifiers are faithful: stance and sentiment correctly reflect the passage's positive assertion, time period is accurate (1694-1778), context is appropriately empty, and quote is verbatim.
  • assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    was also king of coffee drinkers
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Voltaire (1694-1778) the king of wits, was also king of coffee drinkers.' The subject, predicate, and object are all explicitly present with the exact phrasing quoted.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — Viewpoint qualifier is incorrect. The passage attributes this statement to the passage author/narrator, not a named source, so 'viewpoint' should be 'author' is correct. However, the quote is incomplete and inaccurate: the full quote is 'the king of wits, was also king of coffee drinkers' which includes important context that Voltaire was called 'king of wits' first. The time qualifiers are faithful - they match Voltaire's life span (1694-1778) as stated in the passage. Sentiment is appropriate as 'positive', and stance 'asserts' is correct. Context is appropriately empty. Minor deduction for incomplete quote selection.
  • Fontenelle and Voltaire have both been quoted as authors of the famous reply
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states that 'Fontenelle and Voltaire have both been quoted as authors of the famous reply to the remark that coffee was a slow poison.' This exactly matches the claim that Voltaire has been quoted as author of this famous reply.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote accurately reflects the passage's statement that 'Fontenelle and Voltaire have both been quoted as authors of the famous reply to the remark that coffee was a slow poison.' The viewpoint is correct as 'author' (the passage itself attributes the quote to multiple sources via 'have been quoted as authors'). However, there is a minor issue: the claim's predicate 'has been quoted as author of' is singular, while the passage presents this as shared authorship ('both been quoted as authors'). This is a subtle distinction but the claim could more precisely reflect that Voltaire is one of two figures quoted as potential authors rather than the sole author. The time qualifiers are appropriately null since the passage provides no temporal scope, and the context is appropriately empty. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral presentation. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim.
  • Voltaire died at age eighty-four
    Voltaire died at eighty-four.
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage with the exact quote: 'Voltaire died at eighty-four.' No rewording or interpretation is required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage makes this statement directly without attribution to a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the declarative nature of the passage. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a factual biographical statement. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal context for when Voltaire died. The context is empty, which is appropriate as there are no sense or role restrictions. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • coffee was adored by Voltaire
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    adored by Voltaire
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage states that coffee was 'adored by Voltaire' in the opening lines, which directly supports the claim. The wording is slightly rewarded from the original quote but the core assertion is clearly present and not contradicted by the text.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote 'adored by Voltaire' appears verbatim and the sentiment is correctly identified as positive. However, the viewpoint qualifier is imprecise: the passage attributes this statement to Maumenet (identified at the end as the author of these verses), not to a generic 'author.' The claim should specify 'viewpoint': 'Maumenet' rather than 'author' to be fully faithful to the passage's attribution. All other qualifiers (stance, sentiment, time, context) are appropriately rendered.
  • It was in reality the work of Voltaire
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly and explicitly stated in the passage: 'It was in reality the work of Voltaire.' The passage clearly indicates that despite being purported to have been written by Mr. Hume, the play was actually authored by Voltaire.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly set to 'author' (the passage presents this as factual information rather than attributed to a named source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for the passage's straightforward declaration. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. The time qualifiers are null, which is correct since the passage does not provide a specific time when Voltaire wrote it (only when it appeared in France in 1760). The context is empty, which is appropriate as no specific sense or role restriction applies. The quote 'It was in reality the work of Voltaire' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim that Voltaire was the actual author.
  • _Cafe; ou, l'Ecossaise, Le_, Voltaire
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The entry '_Cafe; ou, l'Ecossaise, Le_, Voltaire' clearly indicates that Voltaire is the author of this work, with no ambiguity or additional interpretation required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly 'author' since the passage lists the work and credits Voltaire as author without attribution to a named source. The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as a straightforward factual listing. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral bibliographic tone. Time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no temporal information. Context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage makes no contextual restrictions. The quote '_Cafe; ou, l'Ecossaise, Le_, Voltaire' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim that Voltaire wrote this work.
  • _Coffee House; or, Fair Fugitive, The_, Voltaire
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states '_Coffee House; or, Fair Fugitive, The_, Voltaire' in the plays list, clearly indicating that Voltaire is the author of this work.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly set to 'author' (not a named source), the stance is 'asserts' as the passage simply lists the work, sentiment is neutral (appropriate for a bibliographic entry), time is null (no temporal information provided), context is empty (no sense restriction given), and the quote appears verbatim in the passage supporting the authorship claim.
  • Socrates written by Voltaire
    _Socrates_, Voltaire
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which lists '_Socrates_, Voltaire' in the plays section, clearly indicating that Voltaire is the author of the play Socrates.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage lists the work with the author's name in standard bibliographic format). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' - the passage simply documents the work's existence without disputing it. The sentiment is neutral, matching the factual nature of a bibliography entry. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal information. The context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no restrictive context about which sense of 'Socrates' is meant. The quote '_Socrates_, Voltaire' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim that Voltaire wrote this work.

Chatfield-Taylor

  • Voltaire probably imitated La Bottega di Caffe
    questionsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    Chatfield-Taylor[353] thinks Voltaire probably imitated _La Bottega di Caffe_
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'Chatfield-Taylor[353] thinks Voltaire probably imitated _La Bottega di Caffe_ in his _Le Cafe, ou l'Ecossaise_.' The claim accurately captures this attribution and the viewpoint holder.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.80 pass — The claim is mostly faithful to the passage. The viewpoint (Chatfield-Taylor) and quote are accurate and correctly attributed. However, the 'stance' qualifier is incorrect: the passage uses 'thinks' not 'disputes' or 'questions' - this indicates Chatfield-Taylor's opinion/theory rather than skepticism about the claim itself. The stance should be neutral or removed rather than marked as 'questions'. Sentiment and time qualifiers are appropriately set to neutral/null. Context is appropriately empty.

Voltaire

  • Voltaire has been poisoning himself with coffee nearly eighty years
    assertsambivalentsource: coffee-pg28500
    I have been poisoning myself for nearly eighty years
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which contains Voltaire's exact quote: 'Well, I have been poisoning myself for nearly eighty years.' The subject, predicate, object, and temporal specification all match the passage exactly as stated.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Voltaire as the source. The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage presents Voltaire making this statement directly. The sentiment 'ambivalent' accurately captures Voltaire's ironic, somewhat jesting tone when responding to his doctor's warning about coffee's harm. The time qualifier 'nearly eighty years' matches the passage verbatim. The quote appears exactly as stated in the passage and supports the claim. The context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no specific contextual restriction beyond the statement itself.

passage

  • Voltaire accused mme. de sevigne of saying Racine and coffee will pass ⟨in his preface to Irene⟩
    It was Voltaire in his preface to _Irene_ who thus accused the amiable letter-writer
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text explicitly states: 'It was Voltaire in his preface to _Irene_ who thus accused the amiable letter-writer,' clearly establishing that Voltaire accused Mme. de Sevigne of the remark about 'Racine and coffee will pass' in his preface to Irene.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is incorrect. The passage does not attribute this statement to an unnamed author - rather, the passage itself makes the claim about Voltaire. The viewpoint should be 'passage' or the passage's own narrator, not 'author'. Additionally, the claim object is somewhat misleading: Voltaire accused Mme. de Sevigne of the quote 'Racine and coffee will pass,' not of 'the remark' generally. The quote provided is accurate and supports the core fact, but the perspective viewpoint does not faithfully represent how the passage frames this information.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'It was Voltaire in his preface to _Irene_ who thus accused the amiable letter-writer' regarding the quote 'Racine and coffee will pass,' which the passage identifies as being wrongfully credited to Mme. de Sevigne.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are correct: viewpoint is 'passage' (accurate), stance is 'asserts' (appropriate), sentiment is 'neutral' (fits the tone), time is null (passage provides no temporal information), and context correctly identifies 'in his preface to Irene'. The quote is accurately drawn from the passage. Minor deduction: the quote is paraphrased rather than verbatim—the passage says 'It was Voltaire in his preface to _Irene_ who thus accused the amiable letter-writer' but the exact phrasing of the accusation itself ('Racine and coffee will pass') comes from the preceding sentence, not from the quoted line. However, this is a very minor issue as the quote does support and directly relate to the claim.

Change over time

1694-1778
  • was king of wits wits
  • was king of coffee drinkers
a short time before 1760
  • brought out Socrates
nearly eighty years
  • has been poisoning himself with coffee