bibliographic attribution
By William Hamilton, English
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The entry for 1780 ca. explicitly attributes '_The Tea Party_' to 'William Hamilton, English,' matching the subject, predicate, and object of the claim exactly as presented in the source material.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — Two qualifier issues: (1) VIEWPOINT - the claim uses 'author' but the passage attributes the work to William Hamilton as the creator, not as a named source making a statement; the viewpoint should be null or reflect that this is a bibliographic attribution. (2) TIME - the passage specifies '1780 ca.' with 'ca.' indicating circa/approximately, but the claim's valid_from and valid_to both use '1780' as exact dates, losing the 'circa' qualifier that indicates uncertainty in the temporal scope.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The entry for 1780 ca. explicitly attributes '_The Tea Party_' to 'William Hamilton, English', matching all elements of the claim including the creator, work title, and date.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies a bibliographic attribution rather than a named source perspective. The stance appropriately uses 'asserts' for a straightforward attribution. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's factual presentation. The time '1780 ca.' matches the passage's dating. The context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no restrictive context for this work. The quote 'By William Hamilton, English' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the attribution claim.