William H. Ukers (author)
the company was incorporated as the Young-Mahood Company
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Samuel Mahood retired in 1906, and the company was incorporated as the Young-Mahood Company.' All elements (subject, predicate, object, and time) are explicitly supported without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage states this as factual narrative). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as a definitive fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. The time is accurate - the passage explicitly states this occurred in 1906 when 'Samuel Mahood retired in 1906, and the company was incorporated as the Young-Mahood Company.' The context is empty as appropriate, since the passage provides no restrictive context limiting the sense or role. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.
E.B. Mahood withdrew in 1890
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'E.B. Mahood withdrew in 1890.' The subject, predicate, object, and time are all explicitly mentioned without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself states this fact without attribution to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as factual information. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time is accurate with 'when' set to 1890, matching the passage's statement. The context is appropriately empty as no specific sense or role is restricted. The quote 'E.B. Mahood withdrew in 1890' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
Samuel Mahood retired in 1906
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Samuel Mahood retired in 1906, and the company was incorporated as the Young-Mahood Company.' The subject, predicate, object, and time are all explicitly supported without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are accurate: viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' (the passage presents this as narrative fact without attribution to a named source), stance is correctly 'asserts', sentiment is neutral, time matches the passage exactly ('1906'), and context is appropriately empty. However, there is a minor technical issue: the passage states Samuel Mahood retired in 1906 and the company was incorporated as Young-Mahood Company, but it does not explicitly state he retired FROM 'Young, Mahood & Co.' The passage indicates the partnership was the entity from 1879, and after 1906 it became incorporated as a different entity, so the retirement is from the partnership era, not explicitly named in the quote. The quote 'Samuel Mahood retired in 1906' is verbatim and supports the claim. This is a very minor semantic ambiguity rather than an unfaithful qualifier.