An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

400,000 unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

400,000C. Risley & Co. — 1 shared claimBritain — 1 shared claimPorto Rico — 1 shared claimC. Risley & Co.BritainPorto Rico
PlaceOrganization

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

George M. Rolph (author)

  • Porto Rico has population of 400,000 ⟨United States⟩
    assertsneutralsource: sugar-pg73616
    Porto Rico 400,000
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly lists 'Porto Rico' under United States territories with a population figure of '400,000', exactly as claimed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual data without attribution to a named source). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' - the passage simply states the figure. Sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a factual population listing. Time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal information. Context correctly identifies Porto Rico within the United States section. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and accurately supports the claim.

J. Ewing Ritchie (author)

  • Britain paid £400,000 1817 ⟨in exchange for treaties⟩
    assertsnegativesource: sugar-pg52820
    for our £400,000 paid in 1817
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states 'for our £400,000 paid in 1817' in reference to payment made by Britain (implied by 'our') in exchange for treaties with Spanish colonies. This claim is fully supported by the text without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, time, and context qualifiers are accurate. However, the sentiment qualifier marked as 'negative' is debatable—while the author presents this payment critically in context, the quoted phrase itself is neutral in tone. The passage attributes the statement to the author through first-person plural ('we have got'), so 'author' is appropriate. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Deducting slightly for sentiment characterization being interpretive rather than explicitly negative in the passage's framing.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • C. Risley & Co. had assets of $400,000 October 1880
    assets at $400,000
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says that C. Risley & Co. had 'assets at $400,000' when its failure was announced on October 27, 1880.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is appropriately attributed to the author (the passage reports these figures as historical fact). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' - the passage presents this as a straightforward statement. The sentiment is neutral, which matches the factual reporting tone. The time is accurately set to October 1880, when C. Risley & Co.'s failure was announced on the 27th. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage provides no restrictive context. The quote 'assets at $400,000' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.

Change over time

1817
  • paid Britain
October 1880
  • had assets of C. Risley & Co.