An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

coffee activity

concept · 23 mentions

the activity of drinking coffee

Other senses of “coffee”

unspecified bean berry beverage beverage preparation business concept crop cultivation culture drink drug flavoring agent food food product green ground product grounds ingredient medicinal substance medicine merchant commodity plant plant material plant product poison product seedling subject of study subject of verse substance variety vice word

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

coffeecoffee (—)coffee (bean)coffee (berry)coffee (beverage)coffee (beverage preparation)coffee (business)coffee (concept)coffee (crop)Guatemala — 2 shared claimsRomero, Matías — 2 shared claimspainting — 1 shared claimengraving — 1 shared claimsculpture — 1 shared claimmusic — 1 shared claimSao Paulo — 1 shared claimBogota — 1 shared claimSumatra — 1 shared claimCosta Rica — 1 shared claimthe king's restoration — 1 shared claimRhodesia — 1 shared claimGuatemalaRomero, MatíaspaintingengravingsculpturemusicSao PauloBogotaSumatraCosta Ricathe king's restorat…Rhodesia
ConceptPersonPlace

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • coffee is celebrated in painting
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    coffee and coffee drinking have been celebrated in painting
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage's opening sentence: 'How coffee and coffee drinking have been celebrated in painting, engraving, sculpture, caricature, lithography, and music.' The subject-predicate-object relationship is explicitly expressed without requiring any external knowledge or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (as an unnamed source presenting chapter contents). The stance 'asserts' appropriately captures the declarative framing. The sentiment 'positive' matches the celebratory connotation of 'celebrated.' Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope. Context is empty as appropriate since the passage does not restrict the claim to a specific sense. The quote appears verbatim and directly supports the claim.
  • coffee is celebrated in engraving
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    coffee and coffee drinking have been celebrated in painting, engraving
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The opening of Chapter XXXIII explicitly mentions that 'coffee and coffee drinking have been celebrated in...engraving' among other art forms, which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship presented.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'author' (the passage is a table of contents presenting the book's content). The stance is correctly 'asserts' - the passage straightforwardly states that coffee has been celebrated. The sentiment is correctly 'positive' as 'celebrated' carries positive connotation. Time qualifiers are correctly null since no temporal scope is specified in the passage. Context is correctly empty as no specific sense or role restriction is mentioned. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
  • coffee is celebrated in sculpture
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    coffee and coffee drinking have been celebrated in painting, engraving, sculpture
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The opening line explicitly states that 'coffee and coffee drinking have been celebrated in painting, engraving, sculpture, caricature, lithography, and music,' which directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship claimed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (inferred from the chapter heading structure). The stance 'asserts' appropriately captures the declarative framing of the passage. The sentiment 'positive' matches the celebratory connotation of 'celebrated.' The time qualifiers are correctly null since no temporal scope is specified in the passage. The context is appropriately empty as no specific sense restriction applies. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about coffee being celebrated in sculpture.
  • coffee is celebrated in music
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    coffee and coffee drinking have been celebrated in painting, engraving, sculpture, caricature, lithography, and music
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The opening line explicitly lists music among the art forms in which coffee and coffee drinking have been celebrated, making this claim fully supported without requiring outside knowledge or over-generalization.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implicit narrator of the book chapter); the stance is 'asserts' which matches the declarative presentation; the sentiment is positive as 'celebrated' carries positive connotation; the time is null, appropriate since the passage provides no temporal restriction; the context is empty, appropriate as the passage does not restrict coffee to a particular sense; the quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
  • coffee occurs in Sao Paulo
    Picking coffee, Sao Paulo
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by multiple entries in the passage explicitly mentioning coffee activities in Sao Paulo, including 'Picking coffee, Sao Paulo' (207), 'Intensive cultivation, Sao Paulo' (207), and 'Coffee culture in Sao Paulo' (209), confirming that coffee occurs in Sao Paulo.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' since the passage is a table of contents with no named source attribution. The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage simply lists locations. Sentiment 'neutral' matches the factual, descriptive tone of the table of contents. Time qualifiers are correctly null as no temporal information is provided. Context is appropriately empty as the passage makes no restrictive contextual claims. The quote 'Picking coffee, Sao Paulo' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim that coffee occurs in Sao Paulo.
  • coffee occurs in Bogota
    Picking coffee, Bogota
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The table of contents explicitly lists 'Picking coffee, Bogota' on page 211, which directly supports the assertion that coffee occurs in Bogota.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The quote 'Picking coffee, Bogota' appears verbatim as a caption in the passage (line 10). The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as part of its own table of contents/captions, not attributing it to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the descriptive nature of the caption. The time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal information. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. The claim accurately represents that coffee picking occurs in Bogota based on the passage's caption.
  • coffee occurs in Sumatra
    Native picking coffee, Sumatra
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table of contents explicitly lists 'Native picking coffee, Sumatra' (page 216), which directly states that coffee occurs in Sumatra.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (implicit in a table of contents/index). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage simply lists the location. Sentiment is neutral, matching the straightforward descriptive nature of the entry. Time qualifiers are correctly null as no temporal information is provided. Context is appropriately empty as the passage provides no restricting context beyond the geographical location. The quote 'Native picking coffee, Sumatra' appears verbatim in the passage and supports the claim that coffee occurs in Sumatra.
  • coffee is performed in Guatemala
    Indians picking coffee, Guatemala
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is supported by the passage, which includes multiple references to coffee activities in Guatemala (pages 218-220), including 'Indians picking coffee, Guatemala' and 'Coffee culture in Guatemala.' The predicate 'is performed in' is a minor rewording of the direct statement that coffee picking occurs in Guatemala.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — Minor qualifier issue: The quote 'Indians picking coffee, Guatemala' is a caption/heading and does not explicitly contain the predicate 'is performed in' or the verb structure the claim uses. The quote is verbatim from the passage and clearly supports that coffee-picking occurs in Guatemala, but the claim's predicate formulation ('is performed in') is a rephrasing rather than a direct quote. All other qualifiers (viewpoint, stance, sentiment, time, context) are faithful to the passage. The score is deducted slightly for this quote-predicate mismatch, though the semantic support is clear.
  • coffee occurs in Costa Rica
    Picking Costa Rica coffee
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by multiple passages listing Costa Rica locations: 'Coffee cultivation, Costa Rica' (225), 'Picking Costa Rica coffee' (226), and 'Mountain coffee estate, Costa Rica' (226). These entries explicitly state that coffee occurs in Costa Rica.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage qualifiers. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'author' (the passage appears to be a table of contents or index where the author/compiler presents these locations). The stance 'asserts' and sentiment 'neutral' are appropriate for a descriptive index entry. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null as no temporal information is provided in the passage. The quote 'Picking Costa Rica coffee' appears verbatim on page 226. Minor deduction: the context field is empty, but 'coffee' here refers specifically to the cultivation/picking activity in Costa Rica, which could be slightly more specific, though leaving it empty is acceptable since the passage itself provides no restrictive context qualifier beyond the geographic location. Overall, the claim faithfully represents the passage content.
  • kadi of Mecca permits coffee drinking at home and in private coffee 1524
    permits coffee drinking at home and in private
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The 1524 entry explicitly states that the kadi of Mecca 'permits coffee drinking at home and in private' after closing the public coffee houses, exactly as claimed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — Minor issue with viewpoint qualifier: The passage does not explicitly attribute this statement to a named source or the 'author' - it is historical narrative. Using 'author' is acceptable for historical summary statements. Quote is accurate and verbatim. Time qualifier (1524) is faithful to the passage. Stance (asserts) and sentiment (neutral) are appropriate. Context is empty, which is correct as no specific contextual restriction applies. One small deduction: the viewpoint could more precisely reflect that this is historical documentation rather than attributed to 'author', but this is a minor distinction in the context of historical records.
  • Adam Olearius publishes account of coffee manners and customs in persia coffee 1647
    Adam Olearius publishes in German his _Persian Voyage Description_, containing an account of coffee manners and customs in Persia in 1633-39
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The entry for 1647 explicitly states that 'Adam Olearius publishes in German his _Persian Voyage Description_, containing an account of coffee manners and customs in Persia in 1633-39,' which matches all elements of the claim including the subject, predicate, object, year, and context.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.50 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is incorrect: the passage does not attribute this statement to a named source but is itself the source making the claim, so 'viewpoint' should be null, not 'author'. The context qualifier is problematic: '1633-39' represents the temporal period when Olearius observed the coffee customs in Persia, not the context (sense/role/period restriction on the subject or object); context should be null or clarify that this is about coffee customs specifically during that period, not a context qualifier. The quote is accurate and the time (1647 for publication) is correct.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The entry for 1647 explicitly states that 'Adam Olearius publishes in German his _Persian Voyage Description_, containing an account of coffee manners and customs in Persia in 1633-39,' which matches the claim's subject, predicate, object, and time exactly.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' (Adam Olearius himself), stance is properly 'asserts', and sentiment is neutral. The time qualifier correctly identifies 1647 as the publication date, and the quote appears verbatim and supports the claim. The context is appropriately left empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role. Minor note: the passage specifies the account covers coffee customs 'in 1633-39' (the period Olearius observed), which is distinct from the 1647 publication date, but this is handled correctly in the claim's time structure.
  • Aubry-le-Comte wrote on coffee October 1865 ⟨culture and production in colonies⟩
    Culture et production du cafe dans les colonies. Revue Mar. et Col., Oct., 1865.
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The bibliographic entry explicitly lists 'AUBRY-LE-COMTE. Culture et production du cafe dans les colonies. Revue Mar. et Col., Oct., 1865,' confirming that Aubry-le-Comte wrote about coffee culture and production in colonies in October 1865.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, time, and context all accurately reflect the bibliographic entry. The quote is verbatim from the passage. Minor deduction: the quote is technically the article title and journal citation rather than a direct quote demonstrating the predicate 'wrote on,' but this is a standard practice in bibliographic representation and does not constitute a material misrepresentation of the passage's content.
  • Moncada, M. wrote notes on coffee 1905-6 ⟨cultivation and processing⟩
    Notas sobre el cultivo y beneficio del cafe
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The bibliographic entry clearly states that Moncada, M. authored 'Notas sobre el cultivo y beneficio del cafe' (Notes on the cultivation and processing of coffee) published in 1905-6, exactly as the claim specifies.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (Moncada, M.), the stance is appropriately 'asserts' (a factual publication statement), sentiment is neutral, the time matches the passage (1905-6 with normalized dates 1905-1906), context accurately reflects 'cultivation and beneficio [processing]', and the quote appears verbatim in the passage title.
  • Romero, Matías wrote about coffee 1875 ⟨cultivation in Chiapas⟩
    Cultivo del cafe en la costa meridional de Chiapas
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Romero, Matías is listed as the author of 'Cultivo del cafe en la costa meridional de Chiapas' published in Mexico in 1875, which explicitly confirms he wrote about coffee cultivation in Chiapas at that time.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies Romero, Matías as the author (not 'author'). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for a work publication. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the descriptive title. The time '1875' matches the publication date. The context 'cultivation in Chiapas' accurately reflects the book's focus on coffee cultivation on the southern coast of Chiapas. The quote appears verbatim in the passage as the title of Romero's 1875 work and supports the claim that he wrote about coffee cultivation in this region.
  • Romero, Matías wrote about coffee 1893 ⟨cultivation in Mexico⟩
    El cultivo del cafe en la republica mexicana
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which lists 'ROMERO, MATIAS. El cultivo del cafe en la republica mexicana. 2 ed. _Mexico_, 1893. 127 pp.' This bibliographic entry explicitly states that Romero wrote about coffee cultivation in Mexico in 1893.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (Romero, Matías). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for a published work. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the factual, technical nature of the work. The time qualifier correctly reflects the 1893 publication date of the 2nd edition. The context 'cultivation in Mexico' accurately reflects the subject matter indicated by the title 'El cultivo del cafe en la republica mexicana' (Coffee cultivation in the Mexican republic). The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Terry, L.M. wrote about coffee 1901 ⟨culture in Mexico⟩
    Coffee culture in Mexico
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly lists 'TERRY, L.M. Coffee culture in Mexico. Overland Monthly, 1901, n. s. XXXVII: 702-709.' This exactly supports the claim that Terry, L.M. wrote about coffee culture in Mexico in 1901.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies 'Terry, L.M.' as the author (not attributed to another named source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for a publication. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the descriptive nature of the work. The time '1901' matches the publication date in the passage. The context 'culture in Mexico' accurately reflects the work's focus. The quote 'Coffee culture in Mexico' appears verbatim in the bibliographic entry and supports the claim about the subject matter.
  • Yorba, J. wrote about coffee 1895 ⟨culture in Mexico⟩
    Mexican coffee culture
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The bibliographic entry clearly states 'YORBA, J. Mexican coffee culture. 2 ed. _Mexico_, 1895. 64 pp.' which confirms that Yorba wrote about coffee (specifically Mexican coffee culture) in 1895.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies 'Yorba, J.' as the author (not 'author' as a generic attribution). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for a bibliographic entry. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the factual tone of the citation. The time '1895' matches the publication date in the passage (2 ed. _Mexico_, 1895). The context 'culture in Mexico' accurately reflects the work's title 'Mexican coffee culture'. The quote 'Mexican coffee culture' appears verbatim in the passage as part of the title and directly supports the claim about the subject matter of Yorba's work.
  • Stainbank, H.E. wrote about coffee 1874 ⟨culture and preparation in Natal⟩
    Coffee in Natal; its culture and preparation
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The bibliography entry explicitly states 'STAINBANK, H.E. Coffee in Natal; its culture and preparation. _London_, 1874. 78 pp.' confirming that Stainbank wrote about coffee with the specific focus on culture and preparation in Natal in 1874.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are correct: viewpoint correctly identifies Stainbank as the author (not 'author' as generic term), stance is appropriately 'asserts', sentiment is neutral, time is accurate (1874), context properly specifies 'culture and preparation in Natal', and the quote is verbatim from the passage title. Minor consideration: the time qualifier uses both 'when' and 'valid_from' with the same value and 'valid_to' as null, which is appropriate since the passage provides only a single publication year without temporal scope extension. All qualifiers are faithful to the passage.
  • McClelland, Thomas B. gave suggestions on coffee ⟨planting in Porto Rico⟩
    Suggestions on coffee planting for Porto Rico
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The bibliographic entry explicitly lists 'MCCLELLAND, THOMAS B. Suggestions on coffee planting for Porto Rico,' which directly confirms that McClelland gave suggestions on coffee planting in Porto Rico.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies McClelland as the author (not attributed to another named source). The stance of 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage presents this as a factual publication. The sentiment is neutral, matching the informational nature of the bibliographic entry. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since no temporal scope is specified in the passage. The context 'planting in Porto Rico' accurately reflects the restriction stated in the title. The quote 'Suggestions on coffee planting for Porto Rico' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
  • Humphrey Broadbent described coffee 1722
    BROADBENT, HUMPHREY. The domestick coffee man, shewing the true way of preparing and making chocolate, coffee and tea. _London_, 1722.
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The bibliography entry explicitly states that Humphrey Broadbent authored 'The domestick coffee man' published in London in 1722, which shows the true way of preparing and making coffee (among other beverages), confirming he described coffee in that year.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is nearly faithful to the passage. The viewpoint should be 'Broadbent' rather than 'author' since the passage identifies the source by name. The quote is accurate and supports the claim. Time qualifiers are correct (1722). Context is appropriately empty since the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense. Stance and sentiment are appropriate.

Arnold, E.L.

  • coffee be practiced in Southern India
    coffee planting in Southern India
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by multiple entries in the passage referencing coffee planting in Southern India, including ARNOLD, E.L.'s work 'On the Indian hills, or coffee planting in Southern India' from 1895, SHORTT, JOHN's 'A hand-book to coffee planting in southern India' from 1864, and several other publications explicitly mentioning coffee cultivation in Southern India during this period.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is unfaithful. The passage attributes the statement 'coffee planting in Southern India' to a named source (Arnold, E.L., 1895), not to an anonymous author. The claim should use 'Arnold, E.L.' as the viewpoint rather than 'author'. Additionally, the time qualifier is problematic: while 1895 appears in the passage as a publication date for Arnold's work, the claim treats this as the definitive temporal scope for coffee planting in Southern India, when the passage actually provides multiple sources spanning 1864-1900 discussing this topic across different time periods. The 'when' should either be null (since the passage doesn't define a single temporal scope for the practice itself) or should be more carefully qualified to reflect that this is one source's date among many.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. Arnold, E.L.'s work is titled 'On the Indian hills, or coffee planting in Southern India' (_London_, 1895), which explicitly states that coffee planting is practiced in Southern India according to this source.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The quote 'coffee planting in Southern India' appears verbatim in the title of Arnold, E.L.'s work 'On the Indian hills, or coffee planting in Southern India' (London, 1895). The viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are correctly attributed. The time qualifiers (all null) are appropriate since the passage provides no temporal scope beyond the publication year 1895, which is not included in the claim's 'when' field. The context is appropriately empty. Minor note: The normalized date information could theoretically include 1895 from the publication, but its absence is not strictly unfaithful since the passage itself does not frame this as a temporal claim about when coffee was practiced—only when the work was published.

British interests report (1919)

  • coffee should be established in warmer parts Rhodesia 1919
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    it should certainly be established in the warmer parts of Rhodesia
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote 'it should certainly be established in the warmer parts of Rhodesia' appears verbatim in the text, making this a fully supported assertion.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.40 fail — VIEWPOINT ERROR: The claim attributes the statement to 'author' but the passage explicitly attributes this view to a 1919 British interests report, not the passage author. The viewpoint should be 'British interests report' or similar attributed source, not 'author'. The quote is accurate and the statement is correctly characterized as assertive with positive sentiment, but the misattribution of viewpoint is a critical qualifier fidelity failure.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote 'it should certainly be established in the warmer parts of Rhodesia' appears verbatim in the 1919 British interests report, making this a fully supported claim with no added interpretation or outside knowledge required.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies this as from a 1919 British interests report. The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage presents this as a stated claim. The sentiment 'positive' matches the prescriptive tone ('should certainly be established'). The time '1919' correctly reflects when the report was made. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict coffee to a particular sense. The quote matches verbatim and supports the claim.

Great Britain. Foreign Office

  • coffee cultivated in Hawaiian Islands 1897
    Report on coffee culture in the Hawaiian Islands
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by multiple sources in the passage, particularly the 1897 'Report on coffee culture in the Hawaiian Islands' by Great Britain's Foreign Office, which explicitly confirms that coffee was cultivated in Hawaii by that date.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — The viewpoint qualifier is unfaithful. The passage attributes the statement to 'GREAT BRITAIN. FOREIGN OFFICE' (a named source), not to 'author'. The claim should use 'Great Britain. Foreign Office' as the viewpoint, not 'author'. Additionally, the time qualifier is problematic: while 1897 is when the report was published, the passage does not establish that coffee culture in Hawaii was only valid from 1897 onward; the publication date of a report about coffee culture does not necessarily define the temporal scope of the practice itself. The valid_from and valid_to fields should reflect only what the passage states about the time period, which is merely the report's publication date.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The title 'Report on coffee culture in the Hawaiian Islands' from the Great Britain Foreign Office (1897) explicitly confirms that coffee was cultivated in the Hawaiian Islands, exactly as the claim asserts.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies 'Great Britain. Foreign Office' as the source of the claim, matching the bibliographic entry. The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for a report. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the documentary nature of the source. The time '1897' matches the publication date in the passage. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage provides no contextual restrictions on the sense of coffee. The quote 'Report on coffee culture in the Hawaiian Islands' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim that coffee was cultivated in the Hawaiian Islands.

MORREN, F.W.

  • coffee cultivated in Guatemala
    Koffiecultuur in Guatemale
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The first citation explicitly references MORREN's work titled 'Koffiecultuur in Guatemale' (Coffee culture in Guatemala) published in Amsterdam in 1899, clearly establishing that coffee was cultivated in Guatemala at that time.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — Multiple qualifier issues: (1) VIEWPOINT: The claim attributes the statement to 'author' but the passage shows the viewpoint is MORREN, F.W., a named source - the claim should use this named source, not 'author'. (2) TIME: The claim sets 'when' to 1899, but this is the publication date of Morren's work, not necessarily when coffee was cultivated in Guatemala. The passage provides no temporal scope for when coffee was actually cultivated there, so 'when' should be null and both 'valid_from' and 'valid_to' should be null. (3) QUOTE: While 'Koffiecultuur in Guatemale' appears in the passage, it is a Dutch title meaning 'Coffee culture in Guatemala' - the quote should ideally be in the language of analysis or should be noted as a translation.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The title of Morren's 1899 work is 'Koffiecultuur in Guatemale' (Coffee culture in Guatemala), which explicitly asserts that coffee was cultivated in Guatemala.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the claim to MORREN, F.W., whose work 'Koffiecultuur in Guatemale' (Coffee culture in Guatemala) is cited. The stance of 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage presents this as a factual work title without dispute or questioning. The sentiment is neutral, matching the objective nature of a bibliographic reference. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null since the passage provides no temporal scope for the claim itself (the publication date 1899 is metadata about the source, not about when coffee was cultivated). The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a particular sense or role of coffee. The quote 'Koffiecultuur in Guatemale' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about coffee cultivation in Guatemala.

Sir William Coventry

  • coffee aided the king's restoration during Cromwell's time
    assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
    the king himself owed to these seemingly obnoxious places no small debt of gratitude in the matter of his own restoration
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage directly states that the king owed 'no small debt of gratitude' to coffee houses regarding 'his own restoration,' supporting the claim that coffee aided the king's restoration. The phrasing 'aided' is a reasonable rewording of the debt of gratitude owed, and the attribution to Coventry's viewpoint and timing during Cromwell's era are both explicitly stated in the passage.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.95 pass — The claim is highly faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, and time qualifiers all accurately reflect Coventry's argument. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Minor note: the context field is empty, which is appropriate since the passage does not restrict coffee to a specific sense or role here. The claim correctly attributes the statement to Coventry and uses 'asserts' rather than 'disputes' or 'questions,' matching the passage's framing.

Change over time

1524
  • permits coffee drinking at home and in private kadi of Mecca
1647
  • publishes account of coffee manners and customs in persia Adam Olearius
1722
  • described Humphrey Broadbent
October 1865
  • wrote on Aubry-le-Comte
1874
  • wrote about Stainbank, H.E.
1875
  • wrote about Romero, Matías
1893
  • wrote about Romero, Matías
1895
  • wrote about Yorba, J.
1901
  • wrote about Terry, L.M.
1905-6
  • wrote notes on Moncada, M.
1919
  • should be established in warmer parts Rhodesia
1897
  • cultivated in Hawaiian Islands
during Cromwell's time
  • aided the king's restoration

Disagreements

is celebrated in …
  • painting asserts William H. Ukers (author)
  • engraving asserts William H. Ukers (author)
  • sculpture asserts William H. Ukers (author)
  • music asserts William H. Ukers (author)
occurs in …
  • Sao Paulo asserts William H. Ukers (author)
  • Bogota asserts William H. Ukers (author)
  • Sumatra asserts William H. Ukers (author)
  • Costa Rica asserts William H. Ukers (author)
cultivated in …