William H. Ukers (author)
one that the _commisario_ retains until he has sold the consignment of coffee
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which explicitly states that the commisario retains one part of the samples 'until he has sold the consignment of coffee covered by that particular lot of samples.' This is a straightforward restatement of the text.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (narrator describing warehouse procedures). The stance 'asserts' appropriately reflects the declarative nature of the passage. Sentiment is neutral, matching the factual tone. Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no specific temporal scope for this practice. Context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or period. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the commisario's role in sample retention.
the _commisario_, who puts each shipment into "lots" in new "official" bags
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'the _commisario_, who puts each shipment into "lots" in new "official" bags, each of which bears a mark stating that the contents are Sao Paulo growth.' The subject, predicate, and object all match the source text exactly.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (not a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's factual presentation. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for a descriptive statement. The time qualifiers are all null, correctly reflecting that the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is empty, which is appropriate since the passage does not restrict the claim to a specific sense or role. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about the commisario putting shipments into lots in official bags.
the _commisario_ will then put it on the "street," the section of Santos given over to coffee trading
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'If the coffee is offered for sale by the owner, the _commisario_ will then put it on the "street," the section of Santos given over to coffee trading.' This directly supports the subject-predicate-object relationship and context provided in the claim.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage describes the commisario's practice without attribution to a named source). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' - the passage states this as fact. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. Time qualifiers are correctly set to null as the passage provides no temporal scope. Context accurately reflects the passage's restriction: 'If the coffee is offered for sale by the owner.' The quote appears verbatim and directly supports the claim about putting coffee on the street in Santos.
The _commisario_ works with samples of the coffee he has to offer
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'The _commisario_ works with samples of the coffee he has to offer.' The subject, predicate, and object all match exactly what is explicitly written.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.80 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly identified as 'author' (the passage is written from an informative, third-person perspective without attribution to a named source), stance is correctly 'asserts', and sentiment is appropriately 'neutral'. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. Time qualifiers are correctly set to null as the passage provides no temporal scope. However, there is a minor issue with 'context': the passage discusses the commisario's work in a specific professional and geographical context (Santos coffee trading), and while the claim doesn't conflate senses, it could more precisely reflect that this describes the commisario's role in the coffee export/trading process in Santos. The empty context string is acceptable but slightly less precise than it could be. Overall, the claim faithfully represents the passage's statement.
He names his "asking" price, known locally as the _pedido_
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly says 'He names his "asking" price, known locally as the _pedido_', which perfectly supports that the commisario names an asking price called the pedido.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' as the passage presents this as factual description rather than attribution to a named source. The stance 'asserts' correctly reflects the declarative presentation. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the passage's objective tone. The time qualifiers are appropriately null since the passage provides no temporal restriction. The context is empty as the passage gives none. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim about the commisario naming the asking price called pedido.
the _commisario_ can not accept other offers until he has refused the bid
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact quote 'the _commisario_ can not accept other offers until he has refused the bid' appears verbatim, confirming that the commisario cannot accept other offers with the specified condition.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. Viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (passage presents this as descriptive fact without attribution to a named source). Stance is correctly 'asserts' - the passage states this as rule. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's matter-of-fact tone. Time qualifiers are all null, appropriate since the passage provides no temporal scope. Context correctly captures the conditional restriction 'until he has refused the bid' from the passage. The quote matches verbatim and directly supports the claim about when the commisario cannot accept other offers.
the _commisario_ stamps each bag with his identifying mark
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'When a lot is ready for shipment overseas, the _commisario_ stamps each bag with his identifying mark.' The subject, predicate, and object match exactly without rewording or generalization.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage is written in third-person expository style without attribution to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's matter-of-fact description. The time qualifiers are correctly set to null since the passage provides no specific temporal information. The context 'when lot is ready for shipment' accurately reflects the passage's restriction that this action occurs 'when a lot is ready for shipment overseas.' The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim.
- commisario must be paid by three in the afternoon of the same day before eleven in the morning to ship; payment before three in the afternoon of the same day ⟨if ordered before eleven in the morning⟩
If the _commisario_ is ordered before eleven in the morning to ship a lot of coffee, he must be paid before three in the afternoon of the same day
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The quoted sentence explicitly specifies that if the commisario is ordered before eleven in the morning to ship coffee, he must be paid before three in the afternoon of the same day. The claim accurately captures this conditional payment requirement.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself states the requirement). The stance is correctly marked as 'asserts' since the passage presents this as a factual rule. The sentiment is neutral, which matches the passage's matter-of-fact tone. The time qualifiers accurately capture the temporal conditions stated in the passage. The context correctly specifies the conditional scenario 'if ordered before eleven in the morning'. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim. No qualifier deviations detected.
- commisario payment need not be made before three in the afternoon of the following day if receives order after eleven; payment not before three in the afternoon of the following day ⟨if order received after eleven⟩
if he receives the order after eleven, payment need not be made before three in the afternoon of the following day
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The exact phrase 'if he receives the order after eleven, payment need not be made before three in the afternoon of the following day' appears verbatim, supporting all elements of the claim regarding the commisario, payment timing, and conditional circumstances.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual procedure, not attributed to a named source). The stance is 'asserts' which matches the declarative nature of the passage. The sentiment is neutral, appropriate for this procedural statement. The time qualifier accurately captures the conditional temporal scope (if order received after eleven, payment due by three the following day), with valid_from and valid_to correctly set to null as the passage provides no specific calendar dates. The context correctly specifies the conditional 'if order received after eleven'. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
the _pedido_, which is the maximum rate he expects to get, but seldom receives
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly defines the pedido as 'the maximum rate he expects to get, but seldom receives,' which matches the claim's assertion that pedido is the maximum rate the commisario expects to get.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage itself makes this statement, not a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective tone. The time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is empty, which is appropriate as the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or role. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about what pedido means.
When a lot is sold, the samples are turned over to the successful bidder, and he then asks the _commisario_ for larger samples for comparison with the first set
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The final sentence explicitly describes that when a lot is sold, the successful bidder receives samples and then asks the commisario for larger samples for comparison, exactly as claimed.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. Viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (passage prose, not a named source). Stance is properly marked as 'asserts' (not disputed or questioned). Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's descriptive tone. Time qualifiers are all null, correctly reflecting that the passage provides no temporal scope. Context 'when lot is sold' accurately reflects the passage's restriction to this specific scenario. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim about the successful bidder receiving samples and requesting larger ones from the commisario.
when the coffee has been rebagged and marked by both the _commisario_ and the exporter
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the opening sentence of the passage: 'In Brazil, when the coffee has been rebagged and marked by both the _commisario_ and the exporter...' This matches the claim's assertion about coffee being rebagged and marked by both the commisario and exporter in Brazil.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author who is describing the process. The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the descriptive tone. The time qualifiers are all null, which is correct since the passage provides no specific temporal scope. The context 'in Brazil' accurately reflects the passage's geographical restriction. The quote is verbatim from the passage and directly supports the claim about coffee being rebagged and marked by both the commisario and exporter.