An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

Costa Rica commodity

concept · 1 mention

Other senses of “Costa Rica”

unspecified port

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

Costa RicaCosta Rica (—)Costa Rica (port)Great Britain — 4 shared claimsUnited States — 4 shared claimsGermany — 4 shared claimsFrance — 3 shared claimsengland — 1 shared claimGreat BritainUnited StatesGermanyFranceengland
Place

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • England maintained lead as coffee customer Costa Rica For many years
    For many years England had maintained the lead as a coffee customer
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'For many years England had maintained the lead as a coffee customer.' This is a direct quote that fully supports the subject, predicate, and object as presented.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (no named source in passage). The stance 'asserts' accurately reflects how the passage presents this as factual information. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time qualifier 'For many years' and null valid_from/valid_to dates correctly capture the passage's vague temporal scope without inventing specific dates. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict this to a particular sense or role. The quote is verbatim and directly supports the claim.
  • Great Britain received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1903 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1903⟩
    Great Britain 27,756,661
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table explicitly shows that Great Britain received 27,756,661 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica during the crop year ending September 30, 1903, which matches the quoted figure and time period.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents the data without named attribution). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' for a factual statement. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective presentation of trade data. The time qualifier correctly identifies the crop year ending September 30, 1903, with normalized dates (1902-10-01 to 1903-09-30) that properly reflect the fiscal year. The context appropriately specifies 'crop year ending September 30, 1903' to clarify the temporal scope. The quote '27,756,661' appears verbatim in the Great Britain row of the 1903 coffee exports table and directly supports the claim that Great Britain received coffee exports from Costa Rica.
  • United States received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1903 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1903⟩
    United States 6,388,236
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The table explicitly shows that the United States received 6,388,236 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica for the crop year ending September 30, 1903, which matches the cited quote and timeframe.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is highly faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are accurate: viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author', stance is 'asserts' which matches the passage's factual presentation, sentiment is neutral as appropriate for trade statistics, time parameters correctly normalize the crop year ending September 30, 1903 to October 1, 1902 - September 30, 1903, and context appropriately specifies the crop year. The quote is verbatim from the table. Minor note: the quote shows only the numerical value; while this supports the claim, a more complete quote might reference 'United States' from the table header for fuller context, though the current approach is acceptable given the table structure.
  • France received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1903 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1903⟩
    France 1,241,816
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table explicitly shows that France received 1,241,816 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica in 1903 (the crop year ending September 30), as stated in the 'COFFEE EXPORTS FROM COSTA RICA' table.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.95 pass — The claim is highly faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, time period (crop year ending September 30, 1903), and context are all accurate. The quote appears in the table showing France received 1,241,816 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica in 1903. Minor note: the quote is incomplete (missing the full row context), but it does appear verbatim in the table and supports the claim.
  • Germany received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1903 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1903⟩
    Germany 2,676,841
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table explicitly shows that Germany received 2,676,841 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica in 1903 (crop year ending September 30), which is precisely stated in the provided data.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is appropriately attributed to the author (the passage presents factual data without a named source). The stance is correctly neutral assertion. The sentiment matches the factual presentation. The time qualifiers accurately reflect the crop year ending September 30, 1903 (1902-10-01 to 1903-09-30). The context correctly specifies this as the crop year period. The quote accurately appears in the passage's export table showing Germany received 2,676,841 pounds of coffee from Costa Rica in 1903.
  • Great Britain received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1913 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1913⟩
    Great Britain 23,464,827
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The table explicitly shows that Great Britain received 23,464,827 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica for the crop year ending September 30, 1913, matching the quote provided.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents the data objectively). The stance is appropriately "asserts" as the passage states the export figures factually. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral presentation of trade data. The time qualifier correctly identifies the 1913 crop year ending September 30, with valid_from and valid_to dates properly normalized to the crop year period. The context accurately specifies "crop year ending September 30, 1913" as stated in the passage. The quote "Great Britain 23,464,827" appears verbatim in the export table and directly supports the claim that Great Britain received coffee exports from Costa Rica in that year.
  • United States received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1913 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1913⟩
    United States 1,625,866
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The table explicitly shows that in 1913 (crop year ending September 30), the United States received 1,625,866 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica, exactly as indicated in the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are all appropriate (neutral assertion by the author). The time qualifier correctly identifies the 1913 crop year ending September 30, with valid date range 1912-10-01 to 1913-09-30, which matches the passage's temporal scope. The context appropriately specifies "crop year ending September 30, 1913." However, the quote "United States 1,625,866" is incomplete - it should include the full table entry showing "United States 1,625,866 Pounds" or the column header "Pounds" to fully support the claim about coffee exports. This is a minor issue with quote completeness rather than qualifier fidelity, resulting in a 0.9 score rather than 1.0.
  • France received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1913 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1913⟩
    France 741,548
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states in the coffee exports table that France received 741,548 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica in 1913 (crop year ending September 30). This is explicitly shown in the data provided.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are appropriate: the viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents factual export data), stance is 'asserts' (matching the straightforward presentation), sentiment is neutral, time references are accurate for the crop year ending September 30, 1913, and context correctly specifies this is the crop year period. The quote '741,548' appears verbatim in the passage under the France row for 1913. One minor note: while the claim could have included more specificity in the quote (e.g., 'France 741,548 [Pounds]') to fully capture the table context, the essential figure is accurate and verifiable. The claim successfully captures the passage's data about France receiving coffee exports from Costa Rica during that period.
  • Germany received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1913 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1913⟩
    Germany 2,581,055
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table explicitly shows that Germany received 2,581,055 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica during the crop year ending September 30, 1913, exactly as stated in the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual data). The stance is properly 'asserts' as the passage presents this as established fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral, statistical tone. The time qualifier correctly identifies the 1913 crop year ending September 30, with normalized dates consistent with the passage's statement about crop years. The context appropriately specifies 'crop year ending September 30, 1913' which matches the passage's framing. The quote '2,581,055' appears verbatim in the table under Germany for 1913 and directly supports the claim about coffee exports. All qualifiers align precisely with the passage's presentation.
  • Great Britain received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1921 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1921⟩
    Great Britain 13,418,527
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table explicitly shows that Great Britain received 13,418,527 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica for the crop year ending September 30, 1921, which matches the provided quote and context.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, time, and context are all appropriate. However, the quote is incomplete and imprecise: it only shows the numeric value '13,418,527' without the surrounding context that makes clear this refers to Great Britain's coffee exports. A more complete quote would be 'Great Britain 27,756,661 23,464,827 13,418,527' or the full table entry showing the destination. The quote as given could be clearer in supporting the claim, though the figure itself is correct and verifiable from the table.
  • United States received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1921 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1921⟩
    United States 14,137,605
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table explicitly shows that the United States received 14,137,605 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica for the crop year ending September 30, 1921, exactly as stated in the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' (the passage itself makes this assertion without attributing it to a named source). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as factual data. The sentiment is neutral, matching the objective tone of the data table. The time qualifiers (when: 1921, valid_from: 1920-10-01, valid_to: 1921-09-30) correctly correspond to the 'crop year ending September 30' reference in the passage. The context accurately reflects the crop year specification. The quote accurately appears in the table as part of the Costa Rica coffee exports data.
  • France received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1921 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1921⟩
    France 313,538
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The passage directly states in the coffee exports table that France received 313,538 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica for the crop year ending September 30, 1921. This is explicitly shown in the data table provided.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual data). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage states the export figures as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's objective presentation of trade data. The time qualifier correctly specifies the 1921 crop year ending September 30, with valid dates normalized consistently. The context appropriately identifies this as part of the coffee export data for the specified crop year. The quote '313,538' appears verbatim in the table under France for 1921 and directly supports the claim.
  • Germany received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1921 ⟨crop year ending September 30, 1921⟩
    Germany 376,649
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table explicitly shows that Germany received 376,649 pounds of coffee exports from Costa Rica in 1921 (crop year ending September 30), as stated in the 'COFFEE EXPORTS FROM COSTA RICA' table.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are appropriate: viewpoint as 'author' is correct since the passage presents factual data without attribution to a specific source; stance 'asserts' matches the presentational mode; sentiment 'neutral' is appropriate for objective trade data; time qualifiers are properly normalized to the crop year ending September 30, 1921; context accurately reflects the passage's framing. The quote accurately represents the Germany export figure from the 1921 column. Minor deduction only for the quote formatting (quoted as a single number rather than the full context line), though this is a stylistic rather than substantive issue.
  • Great Britain received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1900 ⟨year 1900⟩
    20,587,712 pounds went to Great Britain
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text explicitly states 'In 1900 total shipments were 35,496,055 pounds, of which 20,587,712 pounds went to Great Britain,' confirming that Great Britain received coffee exports from Costa Rica in 1900.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — Nearly all qualifiers are faithful. The viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are all appropriate - the author is asserting neutral facts from the passage. The time qualifier correctly identifies 1900 with valid_from and valid_to both set to 1900, matching the passage's temporal reference. The context appropriately specifies 'year 1900'. The quote is verbatim from the passage and clearly supports the claim. The only minor note is that the quote lacks explicit subject attribution (it reads 'went to' rather than including 'from Costa Rica'), but this is a minor stylistic issue since the passage context makes the origin clear and the claim itself properly specifies both the source and destination.
  • United States received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1900 ⟨year 1900⟩
    8,874,014 pounds to the United States
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text explicitly states in the 1900 data: '8,874,014 pounds to the United States,' confirming that the United States received coffee exports from Costa Rica in that year.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. Viewpoint correctly identifies the author as the source of the factual assertion about coffee exports. Stance appropriately uses 'asserts' for a straightforward factual statement. Sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral presentation of trade data. Time qualifiers (when: 1900, valid_from: 1900, valid_to: 1900) are consistent with the passage's specification of the 1900 crop year. Context 'year 1900' appropriately restricts the claim to that specific time period. The quote '8,874,014 pounds to the United States' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about export quantities. No conflation of senses or periods occurs.
  • Germany received coffee exports from Costa Rica 1900 ⟨year 1900⟩
    3,904,566 pounds to Germany
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly provides data for 1900 showing that 3,904,566 pounds of coffee were exported from Costa Rica to Germany, confirming the subject-predicate-object relationship with the specified time period.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.95 pass — The claim is nearly faithful to the passage. All qualifiers are appropriate: viewpoint is 'author' (correct - the passage itself presents this information), stance is 'asserts' (correct - stated as fact), sentiment is 'neutral' (appropriate for factual data), time is correctly set to 1900 with matching valid_from/valid_to, and context appropriately specifies 'year 1900'. The quote accurately appears in the passage: 'In 1900 total shipments were 35,496,055 pounds, of which 20,587,712 pounds went to Great Britain; 8,874,014 pounds to the United States; and 3,904,566 pounds to Germany.' Minor deduction only for the quote being slightly paraphrased rather than the exact surrounding words, though the core statistic is verbatim.

Change over time

1900
  • received coffee exports from Great Britain
  • received coffee exports from United States
  • received coffee exports from Germany
1903
  • received coffee exports from Great Britain
  • received coffee exports from United States
  • received coffee exports from France
  • received coffee exports from Germany
1913
  • received coffee exports from Great Britain
  • received coffee exports from United States
  • received coffee exports from France
  • received coffee exports from Germany
1921
  • received coffee exports from Great Britain
  • received coffee exports from United States
  • received coffee exports from France
  • received coffee exports from Germany
For many years
  • maintained lead as coffee customer England