idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

discrimination reaction time test

concept · 1 mention

A test measuring choice reaction time through discrimination tasks

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • discrimination reaction time shows retardation at small doses
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    Discrimination reaction time Ret.
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The table shows 'Discrimination reaction time' (row 7) with 'Ret.' (retardation) listed under 'Small Doses', exactly matching the subject, predicate, and object of the claim.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' (the table presents findings without attribution to a named source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the table presents factual data. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the objective, scientific nature of the table. The time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal information. The context is appropriately empty as the passage gives none. The quote 'Discrimination reaction time Ret.' appears verbatim in row 7 of the table under 'Small Doses' column and directly supports the claim that discrimination reaction time shows retardation (abbreviated as 'Ret.') at small doses.
  • discrimination reaction time shows no change at medium doses
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    0
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. In the table row for 'Discrimination reaction time' (test 7), the 'Medium Doses' column shows '0', which directly indicates no change at medium doses.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.70 pass — The claim is minimally acceptable but has one issue: the quote '0' is not truly verbatim support for the full claim 'discrimination reaction time shows no change at medium doses.' While '0' appears in the table at the intersection of row 7 (Discrimination reaction time) and the Medium Doses column, and the claim's substance is accurate, a single '0' symbol is insufficient as a supporting quote. The qualifiers are otherwise faithful: viewpoint is appropriately 'author' (representing the table's data), stance is 'asserts' (the table presents factual data), sentiment is 'neutral', time is null (no temporal information given), and context is empty (appropriate since no specific context restriction applies). However, the quote quality is marginal and slightly weakens the overall fidelity assessment.