idchkg
An Unflattened Identity and Change Knowledge Graph

medium doses unspecified sense

concept · 2 mentions

intermediate dosage level in the experimental study

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

medium dosesmotor speed — 1 shared claimcoordination — 1 shared claimtypewriting speed — 1 shared claimdiscrimination reaction time — 1 shared claimsteadiness — 1 shared claimmotor speedcoordinationtypewriting speeddiscrimination reac…steadiness
Concept

Defining properties

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

William H. Ukers (author)

  • motor speed shows standardization at medium doses
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    St. St.
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table clearly shows 'St.' (standardization) for motor speed (tapping test) at both small and medium doses, confirming that motor speed shows standardization at medium doses.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The subject (motor speed via Tapping test), predicate (standardization/St. = St.), and object (medium doses) are all accurately drawn from the table. The viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are all appropriate and neutral. Time qualifiers are correctly null. However, the quote "St. St." is incomplete and could be more precise - the full context should reference "Motor speed 1. Tapping St. St. St." to better show the three dose levels. The context field is appropriately empty as the passage provides none. Minor deduction for incomplete quote representation.
  • typewriting speed shows no change at medium doses ⟨typewriting tests⟩
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    Typewriting (a) Speed St. 0 Ret.
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The table shows typewriting speed under 'Coordination' with a '0' notation for medium doses, indicating no change at that dose level. This is directly supported by the data presented, though the table uses symbolic notation rather than explicit verbal statement.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.30 fail — Multiple qualifier issues: (1) VIEWPOINT - The passage is a data table without attribution to a named source; using 'author' is acceptable, but the claim should reflect this is observational/tabular data rather than asserted fact. (2) CONTEXT - The claim should specify context as 'typewriting speed' (in typing tests) versus 'typewriting errors' which are listed separately in the table (rows 3a and 3b show different results). The claim conflates or incompletely disambiguates these distinct measures. (3) QUOTE - The quote '0' appears in the table for typewriting speed at medium doses, but the claim should clarify this represents 'no change' (St. = Stimulation, 0 = no change, Ret. = Retardation); the bare '0' is ambiguous without explanation of the table's notation system.
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is supported by the table which shows typewriting speed results with 'St.' (stimulation) for small doses, '0' (no change) for medium doses, and 'Ret.' (retardation) for large doses. The '0' notation directly indicates no change at medium doses as claimed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is appropriately 'author' as the passage presents empirical test results without attribution to a named source. The stance 'asserts' correctly reflects the factual presentation of test data. Sentiment 'neutral' matches the objective tone of the results table. Time qualifiers are null as the passage provides no temporal information. Context 'typewriting tests' accurately reflects the specific test category. The quote accurately represents the relevant row showing '0' (no change) at medium doses for typewriting speed.
  • discrimination reaction time shows no change at medium doses
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    0
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. In the table row for 'Discrimination reaction time' (test 7), the 'Medium Doses' column shows '0', which directly indicates no change at medium doses.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.70 pass — The claim is minimally acceptable but has one issue: the quote '0' is not truly verbatim support for the full claim 'discrimination reaction time shows no change at medium doses.' While '0' appears in the table at the intersection of row 7 (Discrimination reaction time) and the Medium Doses column, and the claim's substance is accurate, a single '0' symbol is insufficient as a supporting quote. The qualifiers are otherwise faithful: viewpoint is appropriately 'author' (representing the table's data), stance is 'asserts' (the table presents factual data), sentiment is 'neutral', time is null (no temporal information given), and context is empty (appropriate since no specific context restriction applies). However, the quote quality is marginal and slightly weakens the overall fidelity assessment.
  • steadiness shows unsteadiness at medium doses
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    Steadiness ? Unsteadiness
    judge verdicts (2)
    • groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is supported by the table which shows 'Unsteadiness' in the Medium Doses column for the Steadiness test (row 10). The wording 'shows unsteadiness at medium doses' accurately reflects what the passage states, with only minor rewording from the original table format.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is appropriately 'author' as the passage presents an experimental results table without attribution to a named source. The stance 'asserts' correctly reflects the table's presentation of findings. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the clinical, objective tone of the data. Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope. Context is appropriately empty as no restricted sense or role is specified. The quote 'Steadiness ? Unsteadiness' appears verbatim in row 10 of the table, with the '?' for small doses and 'Unsteadiness' for medium doses, directly supporting the claim that steadiness shows unsteadiness at medium doses.

test data

  • coordination shows no change in medium doses ⟨three-hole test (test 2)⟩
    assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
    2. Three-hole St. 0 Ret. None 1-1.5 3-4
    judge verdicts (4)
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table shows that for the 'Three-hole' coordination test (Process 2), the PRIMARY EFFECT at Medium Doses is indicated as '0', which denotes no change or no effect, exactly as claimed.
    • qualifier_fidelity 0.30 fail — Multiple qualifier issues: (1) VIEWPOINT: The claim attributes the finding to 'author' but the passage presents this as experimental test data/results, not an authored assertion - this should reflect the nature of the source (test data/table). (2) QUOTE: The quote '0' does not appear verbatim in the passage in a way that supports the claim - '0' is a notation in the table but lacks the context needed to verify it supports 'shows no change'. (3) CONTEXT: While 'three-hole test' is mentioned, the passage lists this as test 2 under 'Coordination' - the context should clarify this is specifically test 2 results, not just reference the test name. The core finding (coordination shows '0' or no change at medium doses in the three-hole test) is present in the table, but the qualifiers fail to faithfully represent how this information is presented in the source.
    • groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table shows that for the Three-hole test (test 2), the result for Medium Doses is marked as '0', which indicates no change/no effect. This directly supports the claim that coordination shows no change in medium doses according to this test.
    • qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is appropriately framed as 'test data' rather than attributing to a named source. The stance 'asserts' correctly represents the factual presentation in the table. The sentiment is neutral, matching the objective tone. The time qualifiers are null as the passage provides no temporal scope. The context correctly identifies this as the three-hole test (test 2). The quote accurately reflects the table row showing '0' (no change) for medium doses in the coordination/three-hole test. The claim faithfully represents the data presented.