William H. Ukers (author)
surtax of five francs per bag in Santos
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'Then there is a surtax of five francs per bag in Santos, and of three francs in Rio, which goes toward defraying the expenses of valorization.' All elements of the claim—subject (Santos), predicate (levies surtax on coffee), and object (five francs per bag)—are explicitly supported with the additional context about valorization expenses.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to the author (the passage presents this as factual information without naming a specific source). The stance is 'asserts' as the passage states this as fact. The sentiment is neutral, matching the passage's neutral tone. The time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal information. The context 'valorization expenses' accurately reflects the passage's explicit statement that the surtax 'goes toward defraying the expenses of valorization.' The quote 'surtax of five francs per bag in Santos' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
