large doses unspecified sense

concept · 1 mention

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

Concept

Defining properties

increase peristalsis and defecation coffee
depress respiration and heart coffee
shows retardation at typewriting speed
shows standardization at cancellation test

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Sollmann

large doses increase peristalsis and defecation coffee
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
for _large doses_, increased peristalsis and defecation
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The text explicitly mentions that for 'large doses,' there is 'increased peristalsis and defecation,' and this is attributed to Sollmann's summary as indicated by the citation.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the statement to Sollmann (as indicated by the citation [253]). The stance is appropriately 'asserts' as the passage presents this as a direct finding. The sentiment is neutral, matching the clinical tone of the passage. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a specific sense or role. The quote appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about large doses of coffee increasing peristalsis and defecation.
large doses depress respiration and heart coffee
assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
depression of respiration and heart
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. Sollmann explicitly lists 'depression of respiration and heart' as one of the effects of large doses, making this a fully supported statement with no rewording needed.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the claim to Sollmann (as indicated by the citation [253]). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage presents this as a factual summary without dispute. The sentiment 'negative' matches the harmful health effects described. The time qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no temporal scope. The context is appropriately empty as the passage does not restrict the claim to a specific sense or period. The quote 'depression of respiration and heart' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim about large doses of coffee.

William H. Ukers (author)

typewriting speed shows retardation at large doses
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
Ret.
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is supported by the table which shows 'Ret.' (retardation) for typewriting speed at large doses. The table directly indicates this outcome, though the presentation uses abbreviated notation rather than the full term 'retardation.'
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The subject (typewriting speed), predicate (shows retardation), and object (large doses) are all supported by the table showing 'Ret.' for typewriting speed at large doses. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, time, and context qualifiers are all appropriate - there is no named source attribution in the passage, neutral sentiment matches the clinical presentation, no temporal information is provided, and no specific context restriction is needed. Minor deduction: the quote 'Ret.' is an abbreviation rather than a complete verbatim phrase, though it accurately represents the data presented in the table.

table

cancellation test shows standardization at large doses
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
Ret. ? St.
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage shows in row 8 (Cancellation) under 'Large Doses' the notation 'St.' which according to the table legend indicates standardization. The claim accurately reflects this direct data from the table, though 'shows standardization at' is a minor rewording of what the 'St.' abbreviation represents.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.30 fail — The quote 'St.' does not appear verbatim in the passage in relation to the cancellation test (item 8). The passage shows '?' for medium doses and 'St.' for large doses in the cancellation row, but the quote provided is incomplete and does not support the full claim. Additionally, the viewpoint qualifier 'author' is problematic - the passage is a data table with no attributed source or named author making assertions; the claim should reflect that this is observational data from the table itself, not an author's interpretation. The context qualifier is empty when it should specify that this relates to the cancellation test specifically (which it does in the subject, but context should document any restrictions from the passage - here there are none, so empty is acceptable). The core issue is the incomplete/non-verbatim quote and the incorrect viewpoint attribution.
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the table. Row 8 (Cancellation test) shows 'St.' (standardization) under the 'Large Doses' column, exactly as stated in the claim and cited in the provided quote.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly identifies the source as 'table' (a data presentation format rather than a named author or source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for factual table data. Sentiment 'neutral' matches the objective presentation. Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal scope. Context is empty as appropriate since no contextual restriction is stated. The quote 'Ret. ? St.' accurately appears in row 8 (Cancellation) under the Small Doses, Medium Doses, and Large Doses columns respectively, and 'St.' (standardization) at large doses supports the claim.