William H. Ukers (author)
Speed St.
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is supported by the passage. The table shows 'St.' (standardization) under 'Small Doses' for typewriting speed (test 3a), matching the claim that typewriting speed shows standardization at small doses, though 'standardization' is abbreviated as 'St.' in the original.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The claim accurately reflects the table data showing 'St.' (standardization) for typewriting speed at small doses. The viewpoint is appropriately attributed to the author (the table itself), the stance is assertive, sentiment is neutral, temporal qualifiers are correctly null since the passage provides no time information, and context is appropriately empty. The quote 'Speed St.' appears verbatim in the passage and directly supports the claim.
Ret.
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is supported by the table which shows 'Ret.' (retardation) for typewriting speed at large doses. The table directly indicates this outcome, though the presentation uses abbreviated notation rather than the full term 'retardation.'
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The subject (typewriting speed), predicate (shows retardation), and object (large doses) are all supported by the table showing 'Ret.' for typewriting speed at large doses. The viewpoint, stance, sentiment, time, and context qualifiers are all appropriate - there is no named source attribution in the passage, neutral sentiment matches the clinical presentation, no temporal information is provided, and no specific context restriction is needed. Minor deduction: the quote 'Ret.' is an abbreviation rather than a complete verbatim phrase, though it accurately represents the data presented in the table.