William H. Ukers (author)
Motor speed 1. Tapping St.
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage. The table shows 'Motor speed' with the 'Tapping' test marked as 'St.' (standardization) under the 'Small Doses' column, exactly matching the subject, predicate, and object of the claim.
- qualifier_fidelity 1.00 pass — All qualifiers are faithful to the passage. The viewpoint is correctly attributed to 'author' (the passage presents this as objective data without naming a specific source). The stance 'asserts' is appropriate for factual presentation. The sentiment 'neutral' matches the clinical table format. Time qualifiers are correctly null as the passage provides no temporal information. Context is empty as appropriate, since the passage doesn't restrict motor speed to a particular sense or role. The quote 'Motor speed 1. Tapping St.' appears verbatim and supports the claim that motor speed (tapping test) shows standardization (St.) at small doses.
St. St.
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The table clearly shows 'St.' (standardization) for motor speed (tapping test) at both small and medium doses, confirming that motor speed shows standardization at medium doses.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The subject (motor speed via Tapping test), predicate (standardization/St. = St.), and object (medium doses) are all accurately drawn from the table. The viewpoint, stance, and sentiment are all appropriate and neutral. Time qualifiers are correctly null. However, the quote "St. St." is incomplete and could be more precise - the full context should reference "Motor speed 1. Tapping St. St. St." to better show the three dose levels. The context field is appropriately empty as the passage provides none. Minor deduction for incomplete quote representation.