nerve cells unspecified sense

concept · 3 mentions

cells in the nervous system

Connections

The concepts, people, and places this entity is most linked to by claims — node size is mention count, colour is type, dashed nodes are other senses of the same word.

Concept

Defining properties

is safe stimulant caffein
destroys alcohol ⟨in comparison to caffeine⟩
causes paralysis of nerve cells apocodeine

Perspectives

Claims grouped by the voice that makes them.

Dixon, W.E.

apocodeine causes paralysis of nerve cells nerve cells 1904
assertsneutralsource: coffee-pg28500
The paralysis of nerve cells and nerve endings with special reference to the alkaloid apocodeine
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The passage directly references Dixon's 1904 work titled 'The paralysis of nerve cells and nerve endings with special reference to the alkaloid apocodeine.' While the title indicates apocodeine is discussed in relation to nerve cell paralysis, the exact mechanism or degree of causation is not elaborated in the bibliographic entry itself, requiring minor interpretation of the title's wording.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.90 pass — The claim is faithful to the passage on all major qualifiers: viewpoint (Dixon, W.E.) is correct, stance (asserts) is appropriate, sentiment (neutral) matches the clinical tone, time (1904) matches the publication year, and the quote appears verbatim and supports the claim. The context field is empty, which is acceptable since the passage does not restrict apocodeine to a particular sense or role. Minor note: the quote could be slightly more precise by including "and nerve endings" to fully capture the scope of Dixon's claim, but the current quote is still accurate and supportive.

minority

caffein is safe stimulant nerve cells
assertspositivesource: coffee-pg28500
the caffein content of coffee was a pure, safe stimulant that did not destroy the nerve cells
judge verdicts (2)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly stated in the passage: 'the caffein content of coffee was a pure, safe stimulant that did not destroy the nerve cells like such false stimulants as alcohol, morphine, etc.' The passage explicitly attributes this view to the minority and confirms that caffeine is presented as a safe stimulant that does not destroy nerve cells.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is mostly faithful to the passage. The quote is verbatim and accurate. The viewpoint correctly identifies this as a 'minority' perspective (passage: 'there were many people (but they were the minority) who knew'). The stance 'asserts' and sentiment 'positive' are appropriate. However, the 'perspective' structure conflates what should be distinct qualifiers: the passage attributes this claim to 'many people (the minority)', not an anonymous viewpoint. The claim should specify the viewpoint as 'many people' or 'minority' rather than just 'minority' as a stance category. The context is appropriately empty as the passage provides none. Time qualifiers are correctly null since no temporal scope is given.

minority of informed people

alcohol destroys nerve cells ⟨in comparison to caffeine⟩
assertsnegativesource: coffee-pg28500
did not destroy the nerve cells like such false stimulants as alcohol
judge verdicts (4)
- groundedness 1.00 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage. The text explicitly states that caffein is 'a pure, safe stimulant that did not destroy the nerve cells like such false stimulants as alcohol, morphine, etc.', which directly asserts that alcohol destroys nerve cells.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.60 fail — VIEWPOINT FIDELITY ERROR: The claim attributes the statement to 'minority' as viewpoint, but the passage states this belief was held by 'many people (but they were the minority)' - the viewpoint should be attributed to these people or citizens of that era, not to an abstract 'minority'. Additionally, the quote provided ('false stimulants as alcohol, morphine, etc.') does not support the full claim that 'alcohol destroys nerve cells' - the quote only identifies alcohol as a 'false stimulant' in comparison to caffeine, without explicitly stating it destroys nerve cells. The actual supporting text is 'did not destroy the nerve cells like such false stimulants as alcohol' - this fuller context must be quoted for accurate representation.
- groundedness 0.70 pass — The claim is directly supported by the passage, which states that caffeine 'did not destroy the nerve cells like such false stimulants as alcohol, morphine, etc.' The passage explicitly contrasts alcohol as a 'false stimulant' that destroys nerve cells, compared to caffeine. The claim accurately reflects this statement with only minor rewording.
- qualifier_fidelity 0.85 pass — The claim is largely faithful to the passage. The viewpoint correctly attributes the assertion to 'the minority' of informed people who understood caffeine's safety. The stance 'asserts' is appropriate as the passage presents this as a factual claim by this group. The sentiment is negative regarding alcohol, which matches the passage's characterization of alcohol as a 'false stimulant' that destroys nerve cells. The time qualifiers (all null) are correct since the passage provides no specific temporal scope for this claim. The context 'in comparison to caffeine' is accurate and properly reflects that the claim distinguishes alcohol from caffeine. The quote is verbatim and supports the claim. However, the quote is not a complete representation—it compares alcohol to caffeine's safety, so noting this comparative context in the quote attribution is important for full precision, though the claim itself does capture this through the context field.

Change over time

1904

causes paralysis of nerve cells apocodeine